Description
Week 2 Assignment: Pre-writing, Argumentative Essay Introduction and Thesis, an Argumentative Plan, and First Sources
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Textbook: Chapter 3 and pp. 94-107, 295-297, 306, 337-356
- Lesson
- Link (Word doc): Assignment Template
- Minimum of 4 scholarly sources
Apply the following writing resources to your assignment:
Instructions
For this assignment, you will continue to pre-write and plan for your argument research essay by applying pre-writing to your thesis from Week 1 (revised as necessary according to instructor feedback and your own further thought). You will also construct a first draft of your full introduction paragraph, modeling what you have learned from your Week 2 lesson. Finally, you will provide a list of at least four scholarly sources in APA Style that represent an equal number of sources that support your stance and sources that oppose your stance. See the APA section in the Chamberlain Writing Center for correct referencing of scholarly sources.
Access the Week 2 Assignment Template and complete the four required sections:
- Your Current Thesis
- Pre-writing
- A Draft of Your Full Introduction Paragraph
- List of Sources in APA Style (see the APA section in the Chamberlain Writing Center for correct referencing of scholarly sources)
For tips on and an example of what to do and what to avoid when writing an introduction, refer to the Week 1 lesson.
Writing Requirements
- APA format (see the APA section in the Chamberlain Writing Center for the correct APA format)
- Length: 2 to 3 pages (not including title page & reference page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double spaced
- 12-point Times New Roman font
- Title page & Reference Page (see the APA section of the Chamberlain Writing Center)
- Reference page (4 articles)
Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Proposal Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 1, 2, 5
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Rubric
ENGL147 Wk2
ENGL147 Wk2 |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Thesis Statement |
10 pts
Thesis statement presents a clear stance and is situated within a debate. |
8 pts
Thesis statement may lack some clarity and/or may fall short of asserting a strong stance or of situating the stance within a debate. |
6 pts
Thesis statement needs significant work with clarity or with asserting a strong stance situated within a debate. |
0 pts
Thesis statement is not present or is off-topic. |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Brainstorming |
15 pts
Includes at least 6 on-topic, relevant brainstormed items, 3 minimum for supporting viewpoints and 3 minimum for opposing viewpoints. |
13 pts
Includes at least 6 brainstormed items, but items may lack relevance or may not address a balance of supporting and opposing material. |
11 pts
Includes fewer than 6 brainstormed items, or items lack connection to the topic. |
0 pts
Brainstormed items are not present or are off-topic. |
|
15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction Paragraph Draft |
30 pts
The introduction paragraph is well-structured and flowing. It includes a relevant attention-grabber, relevant background information, and a clear argument stance within a viable debate. Transitions are employed throughout for flow and continuity. |
26 pts
The introduction paragraph includes a relevant attention-grabber, relevant background information, and an argument stance as the thesis. The components may lack clarity or reader appeal, or flow and continuity may need work. |
22 pts
The introduction paragraph is missing some of the key components or needs significant work toward clear composition of some key components. |
0 pts
The introduction paragraph is not present or is off-topic. |
|
30 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Tentative Source List |
30 pts
Includes a list of 4 scholarly sources, at least 2 sources that support the student’s claim, and at least 2 that oppose it. |
26 pts
Includes a list of 4 sources, at least 2 sources that support the student’s claim, and at 2 three that oppose it. Some sources may not be scholarly and/or relevant, or the reference entry is lacking information needed to identify the source’s origin. |
22 pts
May contain fewer than 4 sources, or most sources may not be scholarly in nature nor relevant to the student’s claim. |
0 pts
Sources are not present or are off-topic. |
|
30 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA: Citation and Reference Formatting |
10 pts
All sources are properly cited in the text (if applicable) and referenced where required, demonstrating a mastery of resource and APA citation reference format. |
8 pts
Most sources are cited in the text (if applicable) and referenced where required. Some minor errors may exist in citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information. A clear attempt at correct APA Style was made, but some persistent errors are apparent |
6 pts
Most sources are cited in the text (if applicable) and referenced where required. Numerous changes are needed for the documentation to meet full and correct APA guidelines and/or for source information to be complete. |
0 pts
Sources are not documented or are lacking in any of the important information needed to ascertain the nature of the source |
|
10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Document Formatting and Writing: Mechanics and Usage |
5 pts
The assignment document itself displays correct APA Style in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. |
4 pts
The assignment document may have small errors in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing contains minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. |
3 pts
The assignment document may have major errors in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing contains numerous distracting errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. |
0 pts
The assignment document may completely lack APA formatting (header, pagination, title page) and/or may contain enough errors that reader comprehension is difficult. |
|
5 pts |
Total Points: 100 |
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.