| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction Slide |
| 5 pts
The introduction slide includes a title for the presentation, the student’s name, and the name of the class. |
4 pts
The introduction slide is present but is missing one of the required elements: presentation title, student’s name, or name of the class. |
3 pts
The introduction slide is present but is missing most or all of the required elements: presentation title, student’s name, or name of the class. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 1: The Advertisement and Citation |
| 5 pts
The advertisement is provided visually and is cited correctly in-text. |
4 pts
The slide is missing one of the following elements: the visual presence of the advertisement or a correct in-text citation for the advertisement. |
3 pts
The slide is present but does not provide a viable image and citation. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 1: Fallacy Identification and Definition |
| 5 pts
A viable fallacy related to the advertisement is named, and a good, original definition for the fallacy is provided. The definition is not from the class materials or textbook (or another source) but rather is phrased according to the student’s understanding of it. |
4 pts
A fallacy is named but may not be clearly related to the advertisement. Or, a definition of the fallacy is present but is not correct. |
3 pts
A fallacy is named that does not relate well to the advertisement, or the definition may be missing or not correct. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 1: Synthesis of Fallacy and Advertisement |
| 5 pts
Explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation is clear, accurate, and detailed. |
4 pts
Explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation may not be clear, accurate, or detailed. |
3 pts
Explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation may be confusing, not viable, and/or very brief. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 2: The Advertisement and Citation |
| 5 pts
The advertisement is provided visually and is cited correctly in-text. |
4 pts
The slide is missing one of the following elements: the visual presence of the advertisement or a correct in-text citation for the advertisement. |
3 pts
The slide is present but does not provide a viable image and citation. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 2: Fallacy Identification and Definition |
| 5 pts
A viable fallacy related to the advertisement is named, and a good, original definition for the fallacy is provided. The definition is not from the class materials or textbook (or another source), but rather is phrased according to the student’s understanding of it. |
4 pts
A fallacy is named, but may not be clearly related to the advertisement. Or, a definition of the fallacy is present but is not correct. |
3 pts
A fallacy is named that does not relate well to the advertisement, or the definition may be missing or not correct. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 2: Synthesis of Fallacy and Advertisement |
| 5 pts
An explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation is clear, accurate, and detailed. |
4 pts
An explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation may not be clear, accurate, or detailed. |
3 pts
An explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation may be confusing, not viable, and/or very brief. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 3: The Advertisement and Citation |
| 5 pts
The advertisement is provided visually and is cited correctly in-text. |
4 pts
The slide is missing one of the following elements: the visual presence of the advertisement or a correct in-text citation for the advertisement. |
3 pts
The slide is present, but does not provide a viable image and citation. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 3: Fallacy Identification and Definition |
| 5 pts
A viable fallacy related to the advertisement is named, and a good, original definition for the fallacy is provided. The definition is not from the class materials or textbook (or another source), but rather is phrased according to the student’s understanding of it. |
4 pts
A fallacy is named, but may not be clearly related to the advertisement. Or, a definition of the fallacy is present but is not correct. |
3 pts
A fallacy is named that does not relate well to the advertisement, or the definition may be missing or not correct. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Advertisement 3: Synthesis of Fallacy and Advertisement |
| 5 pts
An explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation is clear, accurate, and detailed. |
4 pts
An explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation may not be clear, accurate, or detailed. |
3 pts
An explanation of how and why an element of the advertisement contains the fallacy is provided. The explanation may be confusing, not viable, and/or very brief. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References Slide |
| 5 pts
The references slide contains a full, APA-correct reference for each of the three advertisements. |
4 pts
The references slide contains an APA-correct reference for each of the three advertisements, but there are notable errors in APA. |
3 pts
The references slide is missing some references and/or contains all brief references that do not contain most APA elements. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing: Mechanics & Usage |
| 5 pts
The slides are is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the presentation. |
4 pts
The slides contain a few major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the presentation. |
3 pts
The slides contain some major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the presentation. |
0 pts
No effort |
|
5 pts |
| Total Points: 60 |
![[Solved] ENGL147N - Week 4 Assignment- Logical Fallacies Presentation- Poking (and Plugging) Holes in Arguments](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Solved-ENGL147N-Week-4-Assignment-Logical-Fallacies-Presentation-Poking-and-Plugging-Holes-in-Arguments-.png)
![[Top Answer] MATH225N - Week 3 Assignment - Standard Deviation - MATH225N Statistical Reasoning for the Health Sciences](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Top-Answer-MATH225N-Week-3-Assignment-Standard-Deviation-MATH225N-Statistical-Reasoning-for-the-Health-Sciences.jpg)
![[Solution] - NR305 - Week 6 Assignment: Mental Health Assessment: Amka Oxendine (iHuman) (Graded)](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Solution-NR305-Week-6-Assignment-Mental-Health-Assessment-Amka-Oxendine-iHuman-Graded.png.webp)
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.