Rhetoric Analysis of the Who, What, and Why of Human Intelligence Gathering: Self-Reported Measures of Interrogation Methods

Description

Snippet

Rhetoric Analysis of the Who, What, and Why of Human Intelligence Gathering: Self-Reported Measures of Interrogation Methods.

Redlich, A. D., Kelly, C. E., & Miller, J. C.(2014). The who, what, and why of human intelligence gathering: Self‐reported measures of interrogation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology,28(6), 817-828.

Rhetoric Analysis

Redlic, Kelly, and Miller (2014) examine the Who, What, and Why of Human Intelligence Gathering: Self-Reported Measures of Interrogation Methods. The article is an eye-opener as it focuses on the HUMINT interrogation methods that the interrogators perceive to be effective. There is no prior research on the interrogation model involving the US, Military, and federal level interrogators. The article focuses on the Who, referring to the objective and subjective interrogators’ traits, what detailing the situation ship of the issue, and the why referring to the intent of the specific action.  The authors’ style is effective as it looks into the entirety of the HUMINT sources. It helps in giving a lead to how the interrogators can avoid the past mistakes that often lead to false confessions by the HUMINT sources.

The essay is based on the criminology field and the authors make use of terms that most of the experts are familiar with. There is extended use of specialized language throughout the test that helps in creating the professional touch of the article.  Whenever the authors use complex terminology such as context manipulation, there is always an explanation of the terminology that makes the readers understand the denoted meaning in the context of the article.  The writer favors complex sentences in making meaning. The complex sentences aid in the explanation of the three attributes of the essay the Who, what, and the why of human intelligence………

(Buy to read more).