Description
Dimensions International College |
BM4005 |
Personal & Professional Development |
Written Assignment (MAIN) |
March-April 2021 |
ASSESSMENT DETAILS | |
Assessment Name: | Personal & Professional Development Written Assignment (MAIN) |
Program | Higher Diploma in Business Management |
Class/ Intake: | |
Assignment Reference: | BM4005-1 |
Lecturer’s Name: | Joseph T. Chan |
Assignment Hand Out Date: | |
Assignment Due Date: |
MODULE SYNOPSIS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES | |
Module Synopsis | |
This module intends to help students to become an effective and confident self-directed person. Hence, students will have personal and professional skills to aspire for their personal and career goals. | |
Module Learning Outcomes | |
LO1 | Identify personal learning style, self-management, and independent learning strategies. |
LO2 | Using appropriate research methods, carry out a research on employability opportunities in a selected industry of your choice. |
LO3 | Conduct personal skills audit and self-appraisal, and develop an action plan for a suitable job position of your choice. |
LO4 | Evaluate progressive achievements of personal goals. |
ASSIGNMENT BRIEF | |||||
TASKS | |||||
The aim of personal and professional development is to help you to manage your own learning and growth throughout your career. It is important that you continue to learn and develop to keep your skills and knowledge up to date and ensure you continue to work safely, legally and effectively. You are currently a student in an educational institution of higher learning and you are about to graduate. You want to take stock of your personal and professional skills in order to achieve your personal and career goals. In line with your aspirations, you are required to prepare a report that covers the following areas: | |||||
1.
|
|
||||
2. | Use an appropriate research method, and carry out a research on employability opportunities in a selected industry of your choice in Singapore.
(Learning Outcome covered – 2; Assessment Criteria – 1-5) |
||||
3. | 3.1 Conduct a self-appraisal by analyzing your own personal Strengths and Weaknesses; Opportunities and Threats.
3.2 Conduct a personal skills audit. (Learning Outcome covered – 3; Assessment Criteria – 1-5)
|
||||
4. | Formulate a personal development plan to help you to develop the knowledge and skill required for the job role that you seek.
(Learning Outcome covered – 4; Assessment Criteria – 1-5) |
SUBMISSION GUIDELINES |
|
ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK: Assignment (WRIT) | ||||||
Programme | ||||||
Module Code & Name | ||||||
Student Name | ||||||
Student ID | ||||||
Class/ Intake | ||||||
No | Assessment Criteria | Full Marks | First Marker | Second Marker | Feedbacks Assessor | |
Task/ Questions | ||||||
1 | Knowledge and Understanding | 20 | ||||
2 | Application | 25 | ||||
3 | Analysis and Evaluation | 30 | ||||
4 | Structure and Writing | 15 |
|
|||
5 | References | 10 | ||||
Total Marks | 100 | |||||
Overall Comments: (Constructive and useful feedback should allow students to understand strength of performance, limitations of performance, and any improvements needed in future assessments. Feedback should be against the learning outcomes and assessment criteria to help student understand how these inform the process of judging the overall grade) | ||||||
|
||||||
Signed | Date | Final Marks | ||||
Lecturer/Assessor | ||||||
Moderator’s Comments | ||||||
GENERAL RUBRICS FOR MARKING ASSIGNMENTS | |||||
Assessment Criteria | Knowledge and Understanding | Application | Analysis/ Synthesis/ Evaluation | Structure and Writing | Referencing |
Description | Present various facts about the concepts and interpret the facts | Finding solutions to a problem or contextual issue using the concepts | Break information into parts, present inferences, defend opinions and make valid judgements | Present the work appropriately with acceptable standards | Identification and acknowledging of sources of references |
Grade/Marks | 20 | 25 | 30 | 15 | 10 |
(A)
80 – 100% |
Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | Clear evidence of an ability to apply, extend and transform such knowledge and understanding. Impressive choice and range of content | Arguments are well developed, sustained and substantiated | Report structure with numbered paragraphs, figures and appendices. Articulate and fluent academic writing style. No grammatical and spelling errors | Outstanding standard of referencing within text and consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references and full details shown in Reference list |
(B)
70 – 79% |
Demonstrates a detailed and systematic knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | Strong evidence of an ability to apply and extend such knowledge and understanding. Content covers all relevant points and issues | Arguments are well-defined and substantiated | Report structure with numbered paragraphs, figures and appendices. Fluent academic writing style with few grammatical and spelling errors | Excellent standard of referencing within text and consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references and most details shown in the Reference list. |
(C)
60 – 69% |
Demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | Substantial evidence of an ability to apply such knowledge and in some context to extend it. Content covers have minor omissions and errors. | Arguments are appropriate and substantiated | Report structure with numbered paragraphs, figures and appendices. Writing style is appropriate but has some spelling and grammatical errors. | Very good standard of referencing with some in-text and consistent use of Harvard referencing system |
(D)
50 – 59% |
Demonstrates a sound knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | Some evidence of an ability to apply such knowledge. Content has minor omissions and errors. | Arguments are usually substantiated | Report structure has no numbered paragraphs and long sentences. Has spelling and grammatical errors. | Satisfactory standard of referencing. No in-text referencing but with Reference list and use of the Harvard system. |
FAIL | |||||
(F)
40 – 49% |
Demonstrates a basic and partial knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | LImited analysis and application of such knowledge. Limited content or muddled understanding. Lacking relevant content. | Arguments are under-developed, and unsubstantiated | Basic report structure. Not always written clearly and has many grammatical and spelling errors. | Limited referencing. Use of the Harvard system with errors and inconsistently applied. |
(F)
20 – 39% |
Significant weakness and gaps in knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | Little evidence of ability to apply such knowledge and understanding. Lacking relevant content. | Arguments are confused and clumsy expressed. | Poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling and grammatical errors. | Inadequate referencing. Did not use the Harvard referencing system. |
(F)
0 – 19% |
No relevant knowledge and understanding of the subject matter | Work contains factual inaccuracies, errors and misconception. Content is inappropriate and inaccurate | No evidence of an ability to engage in analysis and critical evaluation | Poorly written work, lacking structure and paragraphs. Many inaccuracies in spelling and grammar. | No or little attempt at referencing. |
STUDENT DECLARATION |
I/We have read and understood the University Academic Integrity Framework and declare that this assignment is my/our group’s own work and does not involve:
1. Plagiarism 2. Copying 3. Collusion 4. Submitting false evidence of knowledge 5. Commissioning 6. Fabricating references\sources 7. Publication of data 8. Incorporating material previously submitted 9. Unethical research |
Admis staff use only
Student Signature: | Admin staff use only | ||
Received by: |
RECEIPT
To be filled in by student Admin staff use only
Student’s name | Acknowledge receipt by:
|
||
Intake/ Class | |||
Module/ Unit |
|
||
Date Submitted |
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.