-20%

[Solved] BM4005 – Personal and Professional Development

$19.99$25.00

Description

Dimensions International College
 

BM4005

Personal & Professional Development
 
 
 

Written Assignment (MAIN)

March-April 2021
 

 

 

ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Assessment Name: Personal & Professional Development Written Assignment (MAIN)
Program Higher Diploma in Business Management
Class/ Intake:  
Assignment Reference: BM4005-1
Lecturer’s Name: Joseph T. Chan
Assignment Hand Out Date:  
Assignment Due Date:  

 

MODULE SYNOPSIS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
Module Synopsis
This module intends to help students to become an effective and confident self-directed person. Hence, students will have personal and professional skills to aspire for their personal and career goals.
Module Learning Outcomes
LO1 Identify personal learning style, self-management, and independent learning strategies.
LO2 Using appropriate research methods, carry out a research on employability opportunities in a selected industry of your choice.
LO3 Conduct personal skills audit and self-appraisal, and develop an action plan for a suitable job position of your choice.
LO4 Evaluate progressive achievements of personal goals.

 

 

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF
 
TASKS
The aim of personal and professional development is to help you to manage your own learning and growth throughout your career. It is important that you continue to learn and develop to keep your skills and knowledge up to date and ensure you continue to work safely, legally and effectively. You are currently a student in an educational institution of higher learning and you are about to graduate. You want to take stock of your personal and professional skills in order to achieve your personal and career goals. In line with your aspirations, you are required to prepare a report that covers the following areas:
 

1.

 

 

1 1.1 Using Honey and Mumford’s learning styles, discuss:

a)    your preferred way of learning,

b)    one learning barrier that you might have and how you would overcome it.

1.2 What are the effective ways of managing your time?

1.3 When setting your own personal goals, how S.M.A.R.T. could affect your decision?

 

(Learning Outcome covered – 1; Assessment Criteria – 1-5)

 

   
2. Use an appropriate research method, and carry out a research on employability opportunities in a selected industry of your choice in Singapore.

(Learning Outcome covered – 2; Assessment Criteria – 1-5)

3. 3.1 Conduct a self-appraisal by analyzing your own personal Strengths and Weaknesses; Opportunities and Threats.

3.2 Conduct a personal skills audit.

(Learning Outcome covered – 3; Assessment Criteria – 1-5)

 

4. Formulate a personal development plan to help you to develop the knowledge and skill required for the job role that you seek.

(Learning Outcome covered – 4; Assessment Criteria – 1-5)

 

 

SUBMISSION GUIDELINES
  1. All submissions must be in the Turnitin before the due date
  2. Late submission are considered failed
  3. You must acknowledge all the sources of information by clearly citing all materials using Harvard Referencing Style stipulated in Cite Them Right (10th Edn.) by Pears and Shields.
  4. Referencing should be single spaced and hanging indent by 0.5 inches with one blank line between each reference
  5. Word count is allowed to vary +/- 10% excluding the table of contents and references
  6. Report must be typed in black colour on A4 paper size, using a clear 12 point ARIAL font and 1.15 spacing throughout (NOT single or double spacing).
  7. There shall be a margin of 1 inch at all sides

 

 

ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK: Assignment (WRIT)
Programme  
Module Code & Name  
Student Name  
Student ID  
Class/ Intake  
No Assessment Criteria Full Marks First Marker Second Marker Feedbacks Assessor
Task/ Questions
1 Knowledge and Understanding 20      
2 Application 25      
3 Analysis and Evaluation 30      
4 Structure and Writing 15    

 

 
5 References 10      
  Total Marks 100      
Overall Comments: (Constructive and useful feedback should allow students to understand strength of performance, limitations of performance, and any improvements needed in future assessments. Feedback should be against the learning outcomes and assessment criteria to help student understand how these inform the process of judging the overall grade)
 

 

  Signed Date Final Marks
Lecturer/Assessor      
Moderator’s Comments

 

GENERAL RUBRICS FOR MARKING ASSIGNMENTS
Assessment Criteria Knowledge and Understanding Application Analysis/ Synthesis/  Evaluation Structure and Writing Referencing
Description Present various facts about the concepts and interpret the facts Finding solutions to a problem or contextual issue using the concepts Break information into parts, present inferences, defend opinions and make valid judgements Present the work appropriately with acceptable standards Identification and acknowledging of sources of references
Grade/Marks 20 25 30 15 10
(A)

80 – 100%

Demonstrates a sophisticated knowledge and understanding of the subject matter Clear evidence of an ability to apply, extend and transform such knowledge and understanding. Impressive choice and range of content Arguments are well developed, sustained and substantiated Report structure with numbered paragraphs, figures and appendices. Articulate and fluent academic writing style. No grammatical and spelling errors Outstanding standard of referencing within text and consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references and full details shown in Reference list
(B)

70 – 79%

Demonstrates a detailed and systematic knowledge and understanding of the subject matter Strong evidence of an ability to apply and extend such knowledge and understanding. Content covers all relevant points and issues Arguments are well-defined and substantiated Report structure with numbered paragraphs, figures and appendices. Fluent academic writing style with few grammatical and spelling errors Excellent standard of referencing within text and consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references and most details shown in the Reference list.
(C)

60 – 69%

Demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of the subject matter Substantial evidence of an ability to apply such knowledge and in some context to extend it. Content covers have minor omissions and errors. Arguments are appropriate and substantiated Report structure with numbered paragraphs, figures and appendices. Writing style is appropriate but has some spelling and grammatical errors. Very good standard of referencing with some in-text and consistent use of Harvard referencing system
(D)

50 – 59%

Demonstrates a sound knowledge and understanding of the subject matter Some evidence of an ability to apply such knowledge. Content has minor omissions and errors. Arguments are usually substantiated Report structure has no numbered paragraphs and long sentences. Has spelling and grammatical errors. Satisfactory standard of referencing. No in-text referencing but with Reference list and use of the Harvard system.
FAIL
(F)

40 – 49%

Demonstrates a basic and partial knowledge and understanding of the subject matter LImited analysis and application of such knowledge. Limited content or muddled understanding. Lacking relevant content. Arguments are under-developed, and unsubstantiated Basic report structure. Not always written clearly and has many grammatical and spelling errors. Limited referencing. Use of the Harvard system with errors and inconsistently applied.
(F)

20 – 39%

Significant weakness and gaps in knowledge and understanding of the subject matter Little evidence of ability to apply such knowledge and understanding. Lacking relevant content. Arguments are confused and clumsy expressed. Poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling and grammatical errors. Inadequate referencing. Did not use the Harvard referencing system.
(F)

0 – 19%

No relevant knowledge and understanding of the subject matter Work contains factual inaccuracies, errors and misconception. Content is inappropriate and inaccurate No evidence of an ability to engage in analysis and critical evaluation Poorly written work, lacking structure and paragraphs. Many inaccuracies in spelling and grammar. No or little attempt at referencing.

 

STUDENT DECLARATION
I/We have read and understood the University Academic Integrity Framework and declare that this assignment is my/our group’s own work and does not involve:

1. Plagiarism

2. Copying

3. Collusion

4. Submitting false evidence of knowledge

5. Commissioning

6. Fabricating references\sources

7. Publication of data

8. Incorporating material previously submitted

9. Unethical research

 

Admis staff use only

Student Signature:   Admin staff use only
    Received by:  

 

 

RECEIPT

To be filled in by student                                                            Admin staff use only

Student’s name   Acknowledge receipt by:

 

Intake/ Class  
Module/ Unit      

 

Date Submitted      

 

 

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Be the first to review “[Solved] BM4005 – Personal and Professional Development”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *