[Assessment 2 Report] – How companies might effectively make use of available technologies to efficiently manage their supply chains and provide a superior value proposition to their customers. (Managing Digital Enterprise – 44-602557).
February 11, 2022 2022-02-11 14:58[Assessment 2 Report] – How companies might effectively make use of available technologies to efficiently manage their supply chains and provide a superior value proposition to their customers. (Managing Digital Enterprise – 44-602557).
[Assessment 2 Report] – How companies might effectively make use of available technologies to efficiently manage their supply chains and provide a superior value proposition to their customers. (Managing Digital Enterprise – 44-602557).
Report Prompt
Laudon & Laudon (2021) state “the internet and Internat technology make it possible to move from sequential supply chains….to concurrent supply chains.” (p.380). Given this statement, critically assess how companies might effectively make use of available technologies to efficiently manage their supply chains and provide a superior value proposition to their customers.
We have got a ready sample of this assessment 2 report for you! Get in touch via the ORDER FORM or chat with us on WhatsApp/WeChat. We produce A-Grade MBA reports for UK Graduate students.
Your answer should also consider any potential difficulties or issues associated with making use of available technologies to efficiently manage supply chains and to provide a superior value proposition to customers.
Please note:
• You should give examples of appropriate companies to evidence and support your answer where appropriate.
• References that evidence understanding and application of the content of relevant academic articles and publications will also be given credit.
Your answer should be in report format
Feedback:
Students will receive written feedback on their work based on the grid below. Personalized comments will also be provided on individual work.
Sheffield Business School’s Guidance on Word Count for your Assignments
Your assignment is subject to a word count limit. Your tutors will mark the word count stated in the assessment brief, within a +/-10% margin. As your assignment is 2000 words, the absolute maximum word count is 2200. Appendices should only be used to provide supporting information for your work in-text. They will not be marked. The table below identifies what is and is not included in the word count.
| Absolute word limit: We will stop reading and marking your work once this is reached! | 2,200 |
| The word count includes: | The word count DOES NOT include |
| Tables if they are constructed using words Abstract Executive Summaries Quotations, citations, in-text references | Title page Contents page Reference list Appendices Tables only if they are used to present quantitative data |
Assessment Grid
| Individual Written Assignment criteria %Mark | <40% | Pass 40-49% | 2.2 50-59% | 2.1 60-69% | Distinction >70% |
| Critical assessment of how companies might effectively make use of available technologies to efficiently manage their supply chains and provide a superior value proposition to their customers (60%) | Minimum analysis and the critical assessment is descriptive with a lack of evidence provided. | The analysis & critical assessment is at a basic level and tends towards description. There is some evidence of knowledge and understanding. | The analysis and critical assessment is at a reasonable level but does not have enough depth even though there is reasonable evidence of knowledge and understanding. | The analysis and critical assessment is at a good level with good evidence of knowledge and understanding of the issues. | The analysis and critical assessment is at an excellent level with clear signs of originality being shown. A through and comprehensive demonstration of knowledge and understanding. |
| Analysis of any potential issues or difficulties (as per assessment brief) (30%) | Very little or biased analysis and little or no understanding of the issues. | A basic analysis & limited in terms of objectivity. | A reasonably balanced & objective analysis. | A well balanced and clear analysis. | Analysis is exceptionally well balanced and objective. |
| Appropriate academic referencing. Effectiveness of communication and cohesiveness of the submitted work. (10%) | Insufficiently evidenced research. Poor communication and presentation. | Sufficiently evidenced research but lacking in depth. Sufficient communication and presentation. | Reasonable evidence of research. Appropriate communication and presentation | Well evidenced research. Good communication and presentation. | Excellent evidenced research. Excellent communication and presentation. |
![[Solved] ENGL147N - Week 7 Assignment- Final Draft of the Argument Research Paper](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Solved-ENGL147N-Week-7-Assignment-Final-Draft-of-the-Argument-Research-Paper--240x142.png)
![[Solution] - NR305 - Week 3 Discussion: Debriefing of the Week 2 iHuman Wellness Assignment (Graded](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Best-Answer-NR305-Week-3-Discussion-Debriefing-of-the-Week-2-iHuman-Wellness-Assignment-Graded--240x142.png)
![[Best Answer] NR305 - Week 2 Discussion: Reflection on the Nurse’s Role in Health Assessment (Graded)](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Best-Answer-NR305-Week-2-Discussion-Reflection-on-the-Nurses-Role-in-Health-Assessment-Graded-240x142.png)
![[Best Answer] NR305 - Week 2 Assignment: Wellness Assessment: Luciana Gonzalez (iHuman) (Graded)](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Best-Answer-NR305-Week-2-Assignment-Wellness-Assessment-Luciana-Gonzalez-iHuman-Graded--240x142.png)
