(Answered) Required to critique three articles or chapters. The critiques should (1) present the author’s argument sympathetically; (2) discuss the soundness of his or her reasoning, evidence, and conclusions; and (3) offer your thoughts as to the validity and usefulness of the article or chapter.
September 29, 2021 2021-09-29 20:56(Answered) Required to critique three articles or chapters. The critiques should (1) present the author’s argument sympathetically; (2) discuss the soundness of his or her reasoning, evidence, and conclusions; and (3) offer your thoughts as to the validity and usefulness of the article or chapter.
![Political Science](https://prolifictutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Political-Science-1.png)
(Answered) Required to critique three articles or chapters. The critiques should (1) present the author’s argument sympathetically; (2) discuss the soundness of his or her reasoning, evidence, and conclusions; and (3) offer your thoughts as to the validity and usefulness of the article or chapter.
In the following three articles, offer a critique for each
- Arkes. A Natural Law Manifesto, Notre Dame Law Review (2011)
- Collings. The Supreme Court and the Memory of Evil, Stanford Law Review, 71 (2019), 265.
- Orren. The Primacy of Labor in American Constitution Development, American Political Science Review, 89 (1995), 377.
Each critique should;
(1) present the author’s argument sympathetically;
(2) discuss the soundness of his or her reasoning, evidence, and conclusions; and
(3) offer your thoughts as to the validity and usefulness of the article or chapter.
Get your custom answer to the above question here – https://prolifictutors.com/how-to-order/