(Answered) CCJ 4497 RVAA – THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE CAPSTONE RESEARCH POLICY REPORT (Report – action-oriented, advocacy end of the continuum)
October 1, 2021 2021-10-01 14:10(Answered) CCJ 4497 RVAA – THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE CAPSTONE RESEARCH POLICY REPORT (Report – action-oriented, advocacy end of the continuum)

(Answered) CCJ 4497 RVAA – THE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS OF THE CAPSTONE RESEARCH POLICY REPORT (Report – action-oriented, advocacy end of the continuum)
Policy reports directly reflect the different roles that the policy analyst commonly plays, i.e. from researcher to advocate. The type of report that you are writing is one from the more action-oriented, advocacy end of the continuum (but that is nevertheless based purely on evidence and not your opinion). Although there is much variation even at this end of the scale, the most common elements of the policy brief are as follows:
- Title of the Policy Report
- Executive Summary
- Context and Importance of the Problem (also called the ‘Introduction’)
- Pre-Existing Policies, Policy Options, and Research
- Conclusion
- Policy Recommendations
- Reference Page
The following is a description of each of the elements required in your policy report (and note that these should be subheadings in your policy report):
Need a custom paper based on these instructions? Get it here – https://prolifictutors.com/place-order/
- Title of the Policy Report—The title aims to catch the attention of the reader and compel him/her to read on and so needs to be descriptive, punchy, and relevant.
- Executive Summary—The executive summary aims to convince the reader further that the brief is worth in-depth investigation. It is especially important for an audience that is short of time to clearly see the relevance and importance of the report in reading the summary. As such, a 1 to 2 paragraph executive summary commonly includes: A description of the problem addressed; a statement on why the current approach/policy option needs to be changed; and your recommendations for action.
- Context and importance of the problem (i.e. Introduction)—The purpose of this element of the report is to convince the target audience that a current and urgent problem exists which requires them to take action. The context and importance of the problem is both the introductory and first building block of the brief. As such, it usually includes the following: A clear statement of the problem or issue in focus; a short overview of the root causes of the problem; and a clear statement of the policy implications of the problem which clearly establishes the current importance and policy relevance of the issue. It is worth noting that the length of the problem description may vary considerably from report to report depending on the stage on the policy process in focus, e.g. there may be a need to have a much more extensive problem description for policy at the evaluation stage than for one at the option choosing stage.
- Pre-Existing Policies, Policy Options, and Research—The aim of this element is to detail shortcomings of the current approach or options being implemented and therefore, illustrate both the need for change and focus of where change needs to occur. It also should detail the evidence about what will likely work better (or not suffer from the shortcomings). In doing so, the critique of policy options usually includes the following: A short overview of the policy option(s) in focus and the evidence illustrating why and how the current approach is failing and why and how another option is not failing (and is hopefully ‘working’). It is also important for the sake of credibility to recognize all opinions in the debate of the issue.
- Conclusion—you need to summarize briefly what the readers should take away from your research review.
- Policy recommendations—The aim of the policy recommendations element is to provide a detailed and convincing proposal of how the failings of the current policy approach need to change. As such this is achieved by including: A breakdown of the specific practical steps or measures that need to be implemented. You may also include a closing paragraph reemphasizing the importance of action. The recommendations should follow the conclusion.
- Reference Page—Since your policy report is research-driven and evidence-based, you should include a reference page that includes all the journal articles, book chapters, books, and reputable reports that you used to inform your policy report. You should have at least 8, but likely more. Also, you must have in-text cites throughout your policy brief report. Remember, this is not original research by you, thus you should have a copious amount of in-text cites. By way of example, here is a decent illustration of in-text citing:
The swelling of the US system over the last 40 years is due, almost entirely, to an increased rate of incarceration for people of color, mainly for drug-related offenses (Alexander, 2010; Currie,
2013; Sentencing Project, 2010; Tonry, 2011). For young men of color with little education, the prison has become a normal social experience, statistically speaking (Western, 2006). Mass incarceration appears to be with us for years to come as well: while the US prison population recently experienced a slight downtick, estimates suggest that the US carceral system will be larger in 2018 than today (The Pew Charitable Trusts, 2014). This means that, for the foreseeable future, a prison term will serve as a common rite of passage for poor young men of color (Comfort, 2012), an experience that forever dims their life prospects and curtails those of their neighbors, partners, brothers, sisters and children, perhaps for generations to come (Clear, 2007; Wakefield and Wildeman, 2011).
Need a custom paper based on these instructions? Get it here – https://prolifictutors.com/place-order/
RUBRICS
Content Knowledge Rubric | Level of Achievement Evaluators assign a one (0) to any measure that does not meet Beginning (cell one) level performance | ||||
Beginning/ Unsatisfactory 1 | Developing 2 | Competent/ Satisfactory 3 | Advanced 4 | ||
Subject | Student does not | Student is | Student displays solid | Knowledge base | |
have grasp of basic information. | uncomfortable with information and lacks awareness of how various issues affect the CJS. Prerequisite learning is evident although inaccurate or incomplete. | knowledge of important issues in criminology and criminal justice and possesses limited awareness of how these issues affect the CJS. Student is able to explain relevant issues, as well as, assess issues and derive conclusions. | displays scope, thoroughness, and quality. Student displays extensive knowledge of important issues in criminology and criminal justice and how these issues affect the CJS. Student clearly articulates relevant issues, critically examines the issues, and derives logical conclusions. | ||
Knowledge | |||||
Examination | Student fails to | Student possesses | Student possesses | Student effectively | |
cite important or relevant scholarship. Student does not address gaps in the literature. | limited understanding of relevant literature. | general understanding of relevant literature and draws upon knowledge from multiple disciplines. | synthesizes and critiques literature from multiple disciplines and addresses the gaps therein. Student discusses policy implications. | ||
of Literature |
Student’s Position | Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is simplistic and obvious. | Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) acknowledges different sides of an issue. | Specific position takes into account the complexities of an issue. Others’ points of view are acknowledged within position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis). | Depth of content reflects thorough understanding of topic; main points well supported with timely, relevant and sufficient support; provided precise explanation of key concepts. |
Critical Thinking Rubric | Level of Achievement Evaluators assign a one (0) to any measure that does not meet Beginning (cell one) level performance | ||||
Beginning/ Unsatisfactory 1 | Developing 2 | Competent/ Satisfactory 3 | Advanced 4 | ||
Explanation of | Issue/problem to | Issue/problem to be | Issue/problem to be | Issue/problem to be | |
be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. | considered critically is stated, but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, and/or backgrounds unknown. | considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. | considered critically is stated clearly and described systematically, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. | ||
Issues | |||||
Sources and Evidence Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion | Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation or evaluation. | Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis. | Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. | Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a widespread analysis or synthesis. |
Influence of | Shows an emerging | Questions some | Identifies own and | Thoroughly | |
awareness of present assumptions | assumptions. Identifies several relevant contexts | others’ assumptions and several relevant contexts when | (systematically and methodically) analyzes own and | ||
Context and Assumptions | |||||
Considers where | (sometimes labels | when presenting a | presenting a position. | others’ assumptions | |
appropriate the | assertions as | position. May be more | and carefully | ||
disciplinary, | assumptions). | aware of others’ | evaluates the | ||
cultural, social, | Demonstrates | assumptions than | relevance of contexts | ||
economic, | |||||
minimal attention | one’s own (or vice | when presenting a | |||
technological, | |||||
to context. | versa). | position. | |||
ethical, political, or | |||||
personal context | |||||
Conclusions | Conclusion is | Conclusion is logically | Conclusion is logically | Conclusions and | |
inconsistently tied to some of the information | tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the | tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; | related outcomes (consequences and implications) are | ||
and Related Outcomes | |||||
Implications and | discussed; related | desired conclusion); | related outcomes | logical and reflect | |
consequences | outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified. | some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. | (consequences and implications) are identified clearly. | student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order. |
Written Communication Rubric | Level of Achievement Evaluators assign a one (0) to any measure that does not meet Beginning (cell one) level performance | ||||
Beginning/ Unsatisfactory 1 | Developing 2 | Competent/ Satisfactory 3 | Advanced 4 | ||
Content | Main thesis is not | Main thesis is poorly | Main thesis is evident. | Main thesis is clearly stated | |
clearly developed. Uses appropriate and | developed. Uses appropriate and | Uses appropriate, relevant, and | and present throughout the paper. Uses appropriate, | ||
Development | |||||
Thesis and ideas. | relevant content to | relevant content to | compelling content to | relevant, & compelling | |
develop simple ideas | develop and explore | explore ideas within | content to illustrate mastery | ||
in only some parts of | ideas through most of | the context of the | of the subject, conveying the | ||
the work. Minimally | the work. Shows some | discipline and shape | writer’s understanding, and | ||
accomplishes goals | signs of accomplishing | the whole work. | shaping the whole work. | ||
of the assignment. | the goals of the | Generally accomplishes | Completely accomplishes the | ||
assignment. | goals of the | goals of the assignment. | |||
assignment. |
Organization | Unclear organization | Some signs of logical | Organization supports | Fully & imaginatively supports | |
or organizational plan is inappropriate | organization. May have abrupt or | thesis and purpose. Transitions are mostly | thesis & purpose. Sequence of ideas is effective. Transitions | ||
and | |||||
Disciplinary | to thesis. No | illogical shifts & | appropriate. Sequence | are effective. Demonstrates | |
Conventions Clear & consistent organizational pattern; follows rules | transitions. Shows little awareness of criminal justice conventions. | ineffective flow of ideas. Follows criminal justice expectations at a basic level of | of ideas could be improved. Uses criminal justice conventions | successful execution of criminal justice conventions. | |
understanding. | consistently. | ||||
of criminal justice | |||||
Mechanics & | Abundant spelling | Some frequent, | Occasional lapses in | Very few spelling errors, | |
errors, non-existent or incorrect | incorrect punctuation, significant errors in | spelling, punctuation, grammar, but not | correct punctuation, and grammatically correct, leading | ||
Conventions | |||||
Spelling, | punctuation, and/or | grammar causing | enough to seriously | to clear understanding of | |
capitalization, | severe errors in | interference with | distract the reader. | content. | |
punctuation, | grammar that | understanding in | |||
grammar, general | interfere with | some parts of the | |||
understanding. | paper. | ||||
proofreading. | |||||
Control of | Uses language that | Uses language that | Uses straightforward | Uses graceful language that | |
sometimes impedes meaning because of | generally conveys meaning to readers | language that generally conveys meaning to | skillfully communicates meaning to readers with | ||
Syntax | |||||
Language, word | |||||
errors in usage. | with clarity, although | readers. The language | clarity and fluency, and is has | ||
choice, and | Repetitive words and | writing may include | in the portfolio has few | very few errors in language, | |
sentence variety | sentence types. | some errors in language, word choice, and sentence types. | errors in language, word choice, and sentence types. | word choice, and sentence types. | |
Sources and | Neglects important | Uses relevant sources | Uses sources to | Uses sources to support, | |
sources. Overuse of quotations or paraphrase to | but lacks in variety of sources and/or the skillful combination of | support, extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own | extend, and inform, but not substitute writer’s own development of idea. Doesn’t | ||
Referencing Documentation | |||||
and referencing of | |||||
substitute writer’s | sources. Quotations & | development of idea. | overuse quotes. Conforms to | ||
criminology and | own ideas. Possibly | paraphrases may be | Does not overuse | required referencing style. | |
criminal justice | uses source material | too long or | quotes, but may not | ||
research | without acknowledgement. | inconsistently referenced. | always conform to required style manual. |
Need a custom paper based on these instructions? Get it here – https://prolifictutors.com/place-order/